Hollahoop vs UserVoice
A UserVoice alternative for product teams that want the loop without enterprise overhead.
UserVoice is built for large support teams with a sales-led motion. Hollahoop is the lighter, developer-friendly version - same public board, voting, and roadmap, priced for product teams and free to start.
Where UserVoice shines
- Deep integrations with help-desk products like Zendesk
- Reporting suited to large support orgs
- Established enterprise procurement track
Where Hollahoop is different
- Self-serve setup - no sales call to get going
- Public API for everything, no "contact us for an integration"
- Native MCP server for Claude, Cursor, ChatGPT and Codex
Side by side
We compare on shape and architecture, not just feature counts. Anything you can't see here, ask us at hei@hollahoop.app.
| Feature | Hollahoop | UserVoice |
|---|---|---|
| Public roadmap & changelog | Included | Included |
| Voting on feature requests | Included | Varies by plan |
| Native MCP server for AI agents | Built-in | Not available |
| Public API for every feature | Full surface | Subset of features |
| One tool for feedback + roadmap + changelog + docs | Yes | Subset |
| Per-user pricing | Never | Common |
| Custom domain | Coming soon on Starter+ | Higher tier |
| Free plan | No time limit, no card | Limited or trial |
Move your feedback loop in an afternoon
Free tier, no credit card. Bring your existing posts and votes through the public API or MCP server.